89 (SD = dos.27); 4.94 (SD = dos.97), one another groups differing anywhere between half a year and you can 11 many years of matchmaking; seven.76 (SD = 4.01), anywhere between a couple and you can 19 https://datingranking.net/colombian-cupid-review/ decades; and you can (SD = 4.82), anywhere between lower than per year and 30 ages. 8%) and you can lived having household members, if you find yourself those people managing its lovers were generally working individuals (69.2%), at which 53% had school otherwise postgraduate grade. Of the specialized relationship users, 67% got college or university otherwise post-scholar grade, of which 89.8% had been operating, 2% resigned and you may 8.2% unemployed. The functional condition toward hitched players is actually comparable: 89.5% had been doing work, 2.9% was retired and 6.3% was basically unemployed, and you will step 1.3% known some other work position. Inside classification, 62.5% of people had college otherwise postgraduate amounts.
Matchmaking Quality, chosen to confirm requirements legitimacy, was counted towards Relationship Rating Mode–Modified (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt
The information and knowledge showed is actually built-up from inside the context off wide lookup strategies, and that contains an in depth sociodemographic and you can relationships testing, as well as other balances inside extent out of intimate relationship.
Private union try analyzed with respect to the Portuguese variation (Dining table step one) of one’s quicker brand of the latest Persistence Scale (Stanley, 1986), which was interpreted according to the adopting the interpretation and retroversion steps: after permission obtained by journalist, the first measure try translated of the a couple of specialists in the field, both these translations was exposed to retroversion because of the two experts, one to bilingual and one experienced in the use of the fresh English language; in the long run, per adaptation was versus totally new size, opting for the usage of the fresh new terminology and circumstances having better distance in order to they. The latest Portuguese variation therefore contains the latest 14 modern things and you will a comparable address measure and is actually entitled, immediately after deliberation of the group, the private Connection Size (‘Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). On the last stage of translation procedure, the fresh new device are administered to 3 professionals for the purpose of verifying the new adequateness of language together with unambiguous comprehension of what exactly, which have been discussed toward people immediately after application of the latest survey. Because there were no statements stating or even, the things remained a comparable.
With regards to the full duration of the partnership, an average, in many years, into different statuses described is, respectively: dos
by Lind, 2008). Resulting from a revision of the original Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) scale, this instrument is intended to measure relationship quality perception, with the expectation that, according to the theoretical assumptions, both scales will positively correlate. The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.